Obvious versus nuanced transgressions

This draft merges what the community actually said across 7 source items — every source ID is permanent and traceable.

• GTC-016 Reception of feedback: If you make a mistake in terms of the nuanced conversation/policy we are not saying you are a sex offender or a predator or that you crossed a legal boundary. We are saying within this community we require you to be open to feedback. Within this community if you behave in ways where people give you feedback (directly or indirectly) the community will ask for adjusted behavior.
• GTC-021 Define appropriate/inappropriate behaviour – splitting obvious from nuanced behaviour, with examples, such as defamation, spreading misinformation,
• GTC-068 Nuanced things: we value everyone’s safety more than in most public spaces that are not okay in our space.
• OPIN-049 Re: be deliberate in splitting obvious items from more nuanced items in terms of exclusion
• OPIN-057 Let’s be clear about the obvious things (Violence, sexual offences etc.)
• OPIN-058 Lets not mix the obvious transgressions with the more nuanced conversation we are trying to have.
• OPIN-059 If you make a mistake in terms of the nuanced conversation/policy we are not saying you are a sex offender or a predator or that you crossed a legal boundary.

Themes · obvious vs nuanced transgressions · repercussions and exclusion · communication and tone