Why the survey exists

A temperature check with the community — on safety, belonging, and how the community is doing — grounds this work in how people actually feel, so guidelines are refined from data rather than assumption.

Deliberately left open

Running the survey is an adjacent workstream (Plan/00 §2); the instrument is captured here for traceability.

Actually running the Temp Check is an adjacent workstream

The survey instrument is captured here for traceability, but running it — fielding, collecting, and analysing responses — is an adjacent workstream (Plan/00 §2), not part of the current plan.

If left open Several other open points defer to survey data (self-conception, definitions of unsafe, workshop appetite). If the survey isn't run, those deferrals have nothing to resolve against and the 'refine from data, not assumption' promise goes unmet.

Options for resolution

Schedule and resource the survey as a distinct workstream with an owner
Run a minimal version now to unblock the decisions that depend on it
Keep it captured and flag which open points are waiting on its results

Where this comes from · 4 source items

This draft merges what the community actually said across 4 source items — every source ID is permanent and traceable.

GTC-047 Temperature check with community re: thoughts on safety?
OPIN-092 Temperature check with community re: safety? Are there concerns?
OPIN-121 I'm personally interested in learning how people feel about things so as to refine and improve the things accordingly,
OPIN-125 I'm personally interested in learning how people feel about things so as to refine and improve the things accordingly,

Themes · scope of community safety · communication and tone · consent and feedback culture

Your signal on this draft

Sentiment only — no action is taken from these tallies. You can change it any time.

Comments · members only

Comments and tallies are visible to registered members. Log in.