No labels, no call-outs, no accusations

The community focuses on the situation and the behaviour, never on labelling the individual. There are no accusations and no labels — that is the courts' realm; the goal here is simply to be safe and lekker. Call-outs must not become public bullying, the aim is creating safety rather than predator-hunting, and spreading misinformation about a person — whether maliciously or carelessly — is defamation and will be prevented and addressed.

Deliberately left open — CF-002 — this stance is exactly what the tool's specified emergency broadcast of an accused's identity strains against (OD-002/OD-003 open; Stage 2 evidence pending). Moderation of anonymous comments that name people: OD-005/OD-006.

Where this comes from · 9 source items

This draft merges what the community actually said across 9 source items — every source ID is permanent and traceable.

GTC-048 Focus on the game, not the players
GTC-087 Not predator hunting, creating safety. People need to understand this
GTC-088 No accusations, no labels of responders
GTC-091 Call outs do not become public bullying of our own
OPIN-055 Not predator hunting, creating safety. People need to understand this.
OPIN-061 No labels. No accusations. That is the realm of the courts and the legal system as per point 2. We just want to be safe and be lekker.
OPIN-096 Focus on the game, not the players
OPIN-108 We should also be mindful that call outs do not become public bullying of our own
OPIN-137 Spreading misinformation about a person — whether maliciously or carelessly — is defamation, and I would treat it as the harm it is. The aim is twofold: to prevent the damage, and to address the intent behind it.

Themes · respondent support and coaching · communication and tone · legal interface · anonymity and privacy

Your signal on this draft

Sentiment only — no action is taken from these tallies. You can change it any time.

Comments · members only

Comments and tallies are visible to registered members. Log in.